Friday, 24 January 2014

The Birth of the World Cup (2013)

Rugby League’s World Cup has a very intimate relationship with the birth of Rugby League in France. Without France, we may have never had a World Cup at all. And it is because of France that a World Cup may have happened nearly two decades earlier than it did.

The late 1920’s and early 1930’s saw Rugby Union in France riddled with sickening violence on field, which saw three players killed in the 1929 and the death of teenage winger Michel Pradie the following year.

The violence coupled with secret payments to amateur Union players led to the French Union being described as ‘shamateurism’. In 1931 the games governing body omitted France from the 5 Nations Championship and all future international matches until they cleaned up their act. They were readmitted in 1939, but due to the war, did not play an official international fixture until 1947.

This decision meant France had no official countries to play International fixtures against; games which were the biggest drawcards in every country. The only country willing to play France was Germany, a very poor quality side that was regularly beaten.

On New Year’s Eve, 1933 Australian Rugby League tour manager Harry Sunderland, organised a game between his touring Kangaroo’s and the English team to be played in Paris. The French public starved of real international Rugby for a few years, flocked to the game in atrocious conditions. Australia, led by the brilliant Dave Brown, ran out convincing winners 63-13 in front of 10,000 cheering French in the snow. The very next day, Frenchman Jean Galia resigned from the French Rugby Union and set about starting the game of Rugby League in France. On April 6, 1934 they were officially a Rugby League nation.

Just 9 months later, the Rugby League Council debated the merits of a World Championship tournament proposed by the French officials, which would include teams from England, Wales, France, Australia and New Zealand. The council though rejected the concept citing “the impossibility of fielding truly Australian and New Zealand teams.”

As World War II drew nearer, France’s national side became stronger and more competitive. In 1938/39, they won the European Championship for the first time, defeating England 12-9 and Wales 16-10.

The War though saw the game in France suffer horrendously at the hands of the pro-Nazi, collaborative Vichy Government, who set out to ‘delete’ Rugby League, and for a brief period, succeeding.

Paul Barriere, a highly decorated French Resistance fighter, was elected vice-president of the French Rugby League on September 16, 1944, working as the understudy to Marcel Laborde. On July 2, 1947, Laborde handed the reigns over to the much younger and energetic Barriere, giving him the onerous task of reviving the game in France.

Four months later, Barriere proposed to the Rugby League Council his idea for a “World Championship of Rugby Leagues” to be played between Britain, France, Australia and New Zealand. Barriere estimated that the tournament would generate £24,000 which would be more than enough to cover travel expenses for all teams to travel to France. The concept was supported by the Council’s secretary Bill Fallowfield. The board members decided to discuss the concept with their respective national boards before reconvening in the New Year to discuss the matter further.

Barriere’s biggest hurdle in the early stages of his talks regarding the World Cup was that he represented a nation who themselves were not represented on the Rugby League Council. Thus, he put forward another proposal, to form a new governing body for the game that would include a member from all Test playing nations. The Council agreed and on January 25, 1948 in Bordeaux, the International Board of Rugby League was formed. Barriere continued to push for the World Championship but was constantly met with concerns about costs and conflicts with international tours, while also trying to figure out the logistics of such a competition that neither Rugby Union nor League had ever staged before.

After years of providing solutions to problems and designing a format for the competition, Barriere informed the games governing body in early November of 1952, that the French Rugby League would provide £25,000 towards expenses for the tournament. He proposed for the tournament to last 15 days and to be held in France around April and May of 1954. The British delegates immediately accepted the proposal, however the Australian and New Zealand officials were apprehensive and agreed to defer their decisions until after they’d spoken with their respective national bodies.

Ten weeks went by without any word on the progress of talks between the Australian and New Zealand boards, so Barriere sweetened the deal moreso by increasing France’s guarantee from £25,000 to £36,000 as well as proposing to put all the New Zealand and Australian players on the one plane and fly them to France, at the French League’s expense.

French Rugby League secretary Antoine Blan also proposed that a team from the United States would be invited to field a team in the inaugural World Cup, as a means of taking the game to new shores.

Two days later, Australian Rugby League secretary Harold Matthews revealed “France’s idea was a very good one” but the major stalling point was the proposed dates for the competition. Barriere had suggested May 16 to May 31, however the English team would be touring Australia and New Zealand around that time and thus they requested that the tournament be held in October 1954 instead.

The following week, Barriere unveiled the mechanics of the competition. Australia, England, New Zealand, France and United States would all play each other once. The top two teams with the best records would play off in a final to determine the World Champion.

Impatience and frustration reared its head on April 19, 1953, when the British Rugby League officials declared the Australian board as inconsiderate for not immediately agreeing to the World Cup concept. They even proposed moving the British tour to Australia and New Zealand to 1955.

Finally, on November 26, 1953, the Australian Rugby League board approved of France’s World Cup concept, after French and British officials agreed to move it to October and November of 1954. The Australians agreed on the provisos that the French Rugby League:

*would pay for return air fares for all players
*would pay £2,000 to all competing teams to cover accommodation and player allowances
*would retain 20% of all gate receipts to cover ground hire and organisational expenses
*would receive the first £5,000 of the remaining profits, while the remaining profits would be shared equally between the other competing nations.

The Australian board believed that if these were agreed to, that the New Zealand board would also accept the World Cup concept. Blan and Barriere agreed to the provisions set down within a few days. Shortly after, the New Zealand board approved of the World Cup concept.

On December 16, 1953, Barriere sent an invitation to the United States, asking them to send a team to play against France to determine if they would be competitive enough to take place in the World Cup. English officials were not happy about having the United States involved in the World Cup as they hadn’t played any international games and thus were not worthy. Bill Fallowfield suggested that Barriere’s programme should not be adopted until the Australian and New Zealand officials had discussed it.

Barriere quite happily suggested that if the United States were not good enough, then he’d be more than happy to send Wales an invitation. On January 9, 1954 France easily accounted for a United States team 31-0 and the decision was made to omit them from the World Cup. Wales however was not approached to replace the United States.

The International Rugby League Board convened in Brisbane on June 27, 1954, where Antoine Blan explained how the competition would be run and that after the final was played, the World Champion team would play against a combined side made up from players from the other competing nations. This idea was met with little interest. Blan later revealed that the organisation of the World Cup could likely cost the French £47,000, not including the World Cup trophy, which was commissioned by Barriere at the cost of 8 million francs and then donated to the International Rugby League Board.

Just a month before the tournament was due to begin, a heavy blow befall England’s side, when a number of prospective representative players refused to be considered for selection as they believed the wages they would receive for competing was not enough. Other English players made themselves unavailable due to domestic reasons, some of whom were to be undertaking naval training.

After 20 years, a World War, a government that deleted Rugby League in a country, high expense, deliberation and most of all, amazing patience, vision and generosity by the French Rugby League, especially Paul Barriere, the inaugural World Cup kicked off on October 30, which saw France defeat New Zealand 22-13 at Paris in front of 13,240 spectators.

England eventually defeated hosts France in the final 16-12. Overall, a total of 138,329 people attended the 7 games, bringing in around £45,000. France’s official outlay was £38,000. This left £7,000 as profit. According to the arrangement made, France was to receive the first £5,000 and the remaining monies would be split equally among the remaining three countries. However the French tax department claimed all of the remaining monies, leaving the other three countries without a bonus; however the French officials did honour their agreement of paying for each team’s airfares and expenses, leaving no country at a loss.

The inaugural World Cup was considered an overwhelming success on and off the field. Australian team manager Jack McMahon rejoiced, saying “It was a terrific gamble by the French, but it has been a great thing for our code.”

And it continues to be.


1954 World Cup Details
Oct 30 – France def Wales 22-13 – Crowd 13,240
Oct 31 – Great Britain def Australia 28-13 – Crowd 10,250
Nov 7 – Australia def New Zealand 34-15 – Crowd 20,000
Nov 7 – France drew with Great Britain 13 all – Crowd 37,471
Nov 11 – France def Australia 15-5 – Crowd 13,000
Nov 11 – Great Britain def New Zealand 26-6 – Crowd 14,000

Final

Nov 13 – Great Britain def France 16-12 – Crowd 30,368

************This article Appeared in Men Of League Magazine***************

Thursday, 5 December 2013

A Fair NRL Draw (2013)

This week, after much self-promotion, the NRL proudly released its 2014 season draw, with the dates of every game in the first 20 rounds already locked in.

This undoubtedly caused a wide range of views, but the one thing that stood out the most was how some teams were getting more free-to-air coverage on Friday nights than others, while others had copped a heap of games on Monday nights.

This made me wonder if it were indeed possible to make a draw that can be as fair as possible for all teams and most importantly, all the fans of their respective teams.

I also wanted to find solutions to the major issue that the players had expressed, that the season is too long.

And I think I’ve come up with a solution that is fair to all teams and players and in a format that can be used every year.

Key Points
*Each club will play 22 games, 11 home and 11 away
*There will be 4 weekends allocated for representative football only.
*There will be no byes
*There will be no games with rep players rested (unless the clubs wish to do so), providing a fairer competition.
*There will be an International tournament between 4 Pacific nations teams.

The Representative Weekends

These are stand-alone weeks with no club football. They will contain a Pacific Nations tournament between the 4 sides that participated in the last World Cup, Cook Islands, Fiji, Tonga and Samoa. The following year could contain 4 other completely different teams. They will play each other once in the first 3 weeks and play a final on the last rep weekend. This is designed to help give the game bigger exposure in these countries, and give them more rep football to help improve them, in preparation for the next World Cup.

Week 1 – Between Rounds 6 and 7. Friday night to have the City v Country game. Saturday night to have the Australia v New Zealand test. Sunday afternoon to have 2 Pacific nations games.

Week 2 – Between Rounds 11 and 12. Friday night to have the first NYC State of Origin game. Saturday night to have State of Origin game 1. Sunday afternoon to have 2 Pacific nations games.

Week 3 – Between Rounds 14 and 15. Friday night to have the second NYC State of Origin game. Saturday night to have State of Origin game 2. Sunday afternoon to have 2 Pacific nations games.

Week 4 – Between Rounds 17 and 18. Friday night to have the third NYC State of Origin game. Saturday night to have State of Origin game 3. Sunday afternoon to have the final of the Pacific Nations tournament.

The Mechanics
This is how the draw will work. Each team will be given a number from 1 to 16. This can either be chosen randomly, or an alternate method would be to base it on each team’s ladder position from the previous season. The teams numbered 1 to 8 will play each other twice. The teams numbered 9 to 16 will play each other twice. The teams numbered 1 to 8 will play the teams numbered 9 to 16 once.

The draw will see all team play either 5 or 6 Friday games, 5 or 6 Saturday games, 8 or 9 Sunday games and 2 or 3 Monday games.

This draw is designed to work best if the team’s numbers are their ladder position from the previous year as it would ensure the top 8 sides from the previous season will play each other twice, thus removing any prospect of favourable draws. It will also mean that the poorer teams will play each other twice, helping to ensure closer games for the majority of the season.


And so here is the draw. I understand and accept that it won’t be to everyone’s liking and that it may have its flaws. But it must be remembered that what I am attempting to do here is provide a draw that is fair for every team, their fans and the players, while still ensuring a strong competition, stronger representative season and still allowing for the NYC competition to have its own representative season to help with their development and preparation for the NRL, as well as giving more exposure and experience to the Pacific Nations.

Round Home Away Day
1 1 2 Friday
9 10 Friday
3 4 Saturday
13 14 Saturday
5 6 Sunday
11 12 Sunday
15 16 Sunday
7 8 Monday
2 2 10 Friday
6 14 Friday
3 11 Saturday
8 16 Saturday
1 9 Sunday
4 12 Sunday
7 15 Sunday
5 13 Monday
3 5 7 Friday
13 15 Friday
1 3 Saturday
6 8 Saturday
2 4 Sunday
9 11 Sunday
14 16 Sunday
10 12 Monday
4 13 4 Friday
9 8 Friday
15 2 Saturday
12 5 Saturday
16 1 Sunday
14 3 Sunday
11 6 Sunday
10 7 Monday
5 1 4 Friday
9 12 Friday
5 8 Saturday
10 11 Saturday
2 3 Sunday
6 7 Sunday
13 16 Sunday
14 15 Monday
6 2 9 Friday
6 13 Friday
4 11 Saturday
7 16 Saturday
3 12 Sunday
5 14 Sunday
8 15 Sunday
1 10 Monday
REP WEEK #1
7 3 7 Friday
11 15 Friday
9 13 Saturday
12 16 Saturday
1 5 Sunday
4 8 Sunday
10 14 Sunday
2 6 Monday
8 5 4 Friday
13 12 Friday
8 1 Saturday
15 10 Saturday
7 2 Sunday
16 9 Sunday
14 11 Sunday
6 3 Monday
9 1 15 Friday
5 11 Friday
2 16 Saturday
7 9 Saturday
3 13 Sunday
6 12 Sunday
8 10 Sunday
4 14 Monday
10 2 8 Friday
10 16 Friday
3 5 Saturday
12 15 Saturday
1 6 Sunday
4 7 Sunday
11 13 Sunday
9 14 Monday
11 16 3 Friday
12 7 Friday
14 1 Saturday
15 4 Saturday
13 2 Sunday
10 5 Sunday
11 8 Sunday
9 6 Monday
REP WEEK #2
12 4 6 Friday
12 14 Friday
2 5 Saturday
9 15 Saturday
1 7 Sunday
3 8 Sunday
10 13 Sunday
11 16 Monday
13 1 13 Friday
5 9 Friday
3 15 Saturday
6 10 Saturday
2 14 Sunday
4 16 Sunday
7 11 Sunday
8 12 Monday
14 4 3 Friday
12 11 Friday
8 7 Saturday
14 13 Saturday
6 5 Sunday
10 9 Sunday
16 15 Sunday
2 1 Monday
REP WEEK #3
15 7 5 Friday
15 13 Friday
11 9 Saturday
16 14 Saturday
3 1 Sunday
8 6 Sunday
12 10 Sunday
4 2 Monday
16 7 6 Friday
15 14 Friday
4 1 Saturday
11 10 Saturday
3 2 Sunday
12 9 Sunday
16 13 Sunday
8 5 Monday
17 5 1 Friday
13 9 Friday
6 2 Saturday
15 11 Saturday
7 3 Sunday
14 10 Sunday
16 12 Sunday
8 4 Monday
REP WEEK #4
18 12 2 Friday
16 6 Friday
9 3 Saturday
14 8 Saturday
11 1 Sunday
10 4 Sunday
13 7 Sunday
15 5 Monday
19 5 3 Friday
13 11 Friday
6 1 Saturday
7 4 Saturday
8 2 Sunday
14 9 Sunday
15 12 Sunday
16 10 Monday
20 6 4 Friday
14 12 Friday
5 2 Saturday
15 9 Saturday
7 1 Sunday
8 3 Sunday
13 10 Sunday
16 11 Monday
21 1 12 Friday
5 16 Friday
3 10 Saturday
6 15 Saturday
2 11 Sunday
4 9 Sunday
7 14 Sunday
8 13 Monday
22 7 2 Friday
15 10 Friday
5 4 Saturday
14 11 Saturday
6 3 Sunday
16 9 Sunday
13 12 Sunday
8 1 Monday

The current 8 team finals system would be in place at season end.

(Apologies for the format, it's the only way it would work)

Tuesday, 24 September 2013

Officialdom Gone Crazy (2013)

Every week, every year, Rugby League officials, coaches, players, commentators and fans alike are left debating dubious officiating from the past weekend's games.

And as the 2013 finals season reaches its second last week, we have again been met with even more confusing refereeing.

But none of it will surpass the try on the seventh tackle to Cronulla against North Queensland in the first week of the finals. But are the referees entirely at fault?

Over the past few years there have been issues and errors regarding the hawkeye technology used in tennis to determine if a ball is in or out, the video review technology and methodology in AFL when determining if a goal has hit a post or not, the hotspot and snickometer technologiy in Cricket used to determine if a player is out or not and of course, the video referee issues in Rugby League.

Prior to all this technology, referees made errors, but they were human errors that we could all deal with. They game wasn't held up to deliberate a decision. All this tehcnology seems to have hampered all sport more than it has improved it. Once play stops to wait for a ruling to be made, momentum for a player or team is lost which does have a major impact on results.

Furthermore, it puts more attention on the officiating of the game. And when you keep heaping pressure on people who already have to deal with more than enough pressure, well, mistakes are going to be more frequent and more costly.

In Rugby League circles, the issue goes further than just the technology. Its the rules around the technology. First we had the ludicrous 'benefit of the doubt' ruling which favoured one team over the other, instead of using a fair system. Now we have a slight modification on that, whereby the on-field referee must make a decision as to whether its a try or not in their view and then it is up to the video ref to confirm. This however is still open to contention, because if the video referee cannot find enough evidence to overrule the on field referee's ruling, then it doesn't get overruled at all. It almost renders the video referee useless.

The other problem is having two referees. These issues combined convey the message that the NRL and the Refereeing Department have no faith in the on field referees.

Throw in constant rule additions and tweaks (shoulder charges, punching) as well as the issue with players diving and intentionally colliding with decoy runners so as to prevent a try under the obstruction rule and wrestling holds to name the most major has left referees with no confidence, under the most intense pressure every week than any referees in the past, with more things to look for, with fans and commentators berating them at every call more aggressively than ever before, you can start to understand that the issue stems much further than just poor refereeing ability.

If you need evidence to show exactly what I mean, then go and watch some NSW Cup footy. You barely notice the referee, which is a true testament to good officiating.

If we want our refereeing to be better, then we need to show faith in the referees and make their jobs easier. Instead of banning shoulder charges, just ban all contact with the head and neck, however its done. If contact with the head is made, then send the player off, or to the sin bin and let the judiciary deal with them. These players should not remain on the field for hitting someone high.

Revert back to one referee on the field.

Video referee's should not be awarding any tries if they cannot prove certainly that a try has been scored.

The NRL should issue a directive to all NRL clubs that wrestling will not be tolerated. Furthermore, let all clubs know that every match will be scrutinised by the match review committee and if any wrestling holds are being used, the players will be suspended.

The NRL needs to stop forcing the on-field referees to continually monitor more and more aspects of the game.

Friday, 13 September 2013

Three Referees (2013)

Shayne: I need to check the grounding for this try please.
Jason: I'm sorry?
Shayne: I want you to check the grounding.
Jason: I didn't quite catch it.
Shayne: I want to check the grounding for a try.
Jason: Ah, um, er, hang on just one moment Shayne, I'll just switch the radio off. [He switches it on; music blaring]Right, now what was it again?
Shayne: What?
Jason: What was it again?
Shayne: I can't hear.
Jason: What?
Shayne: The radio's too loud!
Jason: Yes, very nice, isn't it.
Shayne: Turn off the radio!
Jason: Pardon? I'm sorry, I don't think my hearing aid's working properly. I've only had it a couple of days. Hang on. [He takes it off and adjusts it.] Yes, there we are, it's working now.
Shayne: Is it a try?
Jason: Gee I’m not sure he’s got that down, you should probably send it up here?
Shayne: I have!
Jason: No, no, there’s definitely some doubt there.
Shayne: Can you hear me?
Jason: What?
Shayne: CAN. YOU. HEAR. ME!
Jason: Oh! Penalty try!
Shayne: What?
Jason: You want to award a penalty try.
Shayne: No.
Jason: Oh, well I'll get Alan then, he deals with penalty tries. I only do the basic stuff.
[Alan enters through the door with his arms outstretched feeling for objects]
Alan: [looking at Jason] you want to award a penalty try do you?
Jason: What?
Alan: You want to award a penalty try do you?
Jason: I can't hear what you're saying, Alan.
Alan: I think you need a scrum differential penalty, not a penalty try.
Shayne: No, I want you to check the grounding!
Alan: Who said that? Is there someone else in here?
Jason: What?
Alan: I think there's someone else in here.
Shayne: Yes. It's me. On your loudspeaker.
Alan: Ah! You wanted the penalty try did you?
Shayne: No, I want you to check the grounding for this try.
Alan: Ah, Jason will see to you about that. He'll be here in a minute. [to Jason] Now, you wanted the penalty try, did you?
Jason: Er, What?
Alan: Penalty try?
Jason: Er, I don't understand, Alan. I’m Jason.
Alan: Why didn't you say you were Jason? You know my lenses play up sometimes.
Jason: What?
Alan: [to Shayne] Ah, I do apologise most sincerely for the inconvenience Shayne. Now, you were after a penalty try were you?
Shayne: No, I wanted to have the grounding checked for this try.
Alan: Jason will deal with you, Shayne. I'm dealing with this penalty try over here.
Shayne: Now, Jason, please check the grounding for this try.
Jason: Pardon? I'm sorry, look, I'm worried about Alan. I think he thinks there’s a penalty try.
Shayne: Well, hadn’t you better go and tell him there isn’t?
Jason: No, no, I'd better go and tell him there isn’t a penalty try. [To Alan] Er, Alan!
Alan: Ah, there you are. I thought I'd lost you.
Jason: Er, no, Alan, there’s no penalty try.
Alan: Well, who asked me to check for one then? Don't be silly, let’s have a look at this penalty try.
Jason: What? No, Alan, I’m Jason.
Alan: Why didn't you say you were Jason?
Jason: [looking at his watch] Almost half-time.
Alan: Ah, sorry. [To Shayne] Now then let’s check your penalty try.
Shayne: No, I wanted to check the grounding of this try!
Alan: Ah. [turns to Jason] So you want to award a penalty try?
Shayne: I just want someone to check the grounding of the ball!
Alan: Ah, er, Jason! There are two referee’s here that would like you to check the grounding of the ball for their two tries!
Jason: What? I can't hear you, Alan, I think it must be my hearing aid. Hang on a moment. [He adjusts it.] Aaaah! Too loud, it hurts! [He hits the side of his head repeatedly.] Ah, that's better. Wait a moment, I've knocked my contacts out. [He begins searching on the floor]
Shayne: Please, for the love of all that’s sacred, can someone check the grounding of this try. Please!
Alan: Three tries now Jason. Boy it’s busy out there today.
Jason: Got it!
Alan: [to Shayne] Jason says it’s a try.
Shayne: Thank you!
[Shayne awards try. Crowd boo’s as the replay appears showing the ball was clearly not grounded].