On Monday
night, the Cronulla Sharks ground out an ugly, hard-fought victory against the
Melbourne Storm. However, during the match, Storm winger Marika Koroibete flung
out his leg while at marker and intentionally attempted a trip on Sharks
halfback Chad Townsend.
As is the
norm in the game today, referee Matt Cecchin put the incident on report. It was
this decision which caught the ire of Cronulla coach Shane Flanagan, who was
still bemused at the light suspension for Manly’s Martin Taupau the previous
week when he hit Sharks centre Jack Bird with a high swinging arm. That
incident was put on report and Taupau copped a one-week ban.
In 1990,
the last full season under the 5-minute and 10-minute sin bin rules (the
5-minute sin bin was scrapped shortly after the 1991 season began), there were
119 incidents that received a 5-minute rest and 27 that incurred 10 minutes in
the bin.
The data
shows a remarkable contrast between 1995 and 2015. In 1995 there were 160 sin
binning’s and 20 incidents put on report. In 2015, this data was almost
reversed, with 12 sin binning’s and 168 incidents put on report.
In 1995,
players who went before the judiciary copped a total of 101 weeks suspension.
In 2015 they copped 111 weeks suspension.
The
biggest difference, though, was in send-offs. In 1995, 32 incidents led to a
player getting marched for the game. In 2015, there was only one early shower.
Of the
168 incidents put on report in 2015, 72 of them lead to a suspension. This
figure, more than anything, is a magnificent advocate for the full-blown
reintroduction of the sin bin. Simply put, if an incident is worthy of going on
report, then the player should also go to the sin bin for 10 minutes.
This
would prove to be a better form of punishment and also force players to be more
disciplined because all infringements would result in the offender copping an
immediate penalty, impacting his team and benefitting the opposition.
The talk
about wanting to have a 13-a-side game for the full 80 minutes in every game is
nonsense.
Currently, an offender’s actions doesn’t have an impact on his team
until the following week – if he is suspended – but his team will have several
days to get a replacement player up to speed to cover the offender.
Meanwhile,
the team that is the victim of the illegal act gets nothing but a penalty and,
in many cases, loses a player during the actual game – thus they suffer twice.
It’s high
time the NRL stops this foolish compulsion to make all games ‘fair, 13-a-side
games’ and start sending offenders to the bin, or off the field.
A fair 13-a-side game is one where all players in the game are playing fair and within the rules. We should only have honourable, rule-abiding players partaking in a game at all times.
**This article appeared on the Commentary Box Sports website**
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.